The 71 Most AMAZING Innovations of All Time


This episode is sponsored by Bill Gates.
Check out Bill Gate’s Blog on Innovation:
Subscribe for more videos:

Created by: Mitchell Moffit and Gregory Brown
Written: by Rachel Salt and Mitchell Moffit
Illustrated: by: Max Simmons
Edited by: Sel Ghebrehiwot

GET THE ASAPSCIENCE BOOK:

FOLLOW US!
Instagram and Twitter: @whalewatchmeplz and @mitchellmoffit
Clickable: and

AsapINSTAGRAM:
Snapchat: realasapscience
Facebook:
Twitter:
Tumblr:
Vine: Search “AsapSCIENCE” on vine!

SNAPCHAT US ‘whalewatchmeplz’ and ‘pixelmitch’

Created by Mitchell Moffit (twitter @mitchellmoffit) and Gregory Brown (twitter @whalewatchmeplz).

Send us stuff!

ASAPSCIENCE INC.
P.O. Box 93, Toronto P
Toronto, ON, M5S2S6

source

Related articles

41 COMMENTS

  1. So cars make the list, but the humble bike is absent? Funny- to me cars are possibly one of the single WORST inventions of all time and a total misuse of one of our best- the ICE. There is absolutely NO use for a car that is not better served by a train, bus, truck, bike or foot. Carsflattened and uglified our cities, they make our air toxic to breathe and prevent our children playing outside. Car dependency has made us unaware how bad it is- we are like drug addicts who can't see how devastating this "great" invention has truly been, how much putting it's apparent convenience up on a pedestal has done to move us further apart and make our cities and overall environment more dangerous and damaged! Without cars cities would be more compact, less baron and more of a joy to navigate and for long distances we used to build railways- now we are seemingly stuck with expensive, polluting, ugly death machines! The humble bike and the mighty train could still be the most important innovations in transport EVER and vital to tackling climate change! Electric cars won't work because they destroy roads and the batteries are environmentally damaging to mine, and still depend on readily available energy. Forget Elon and his push to own the whole transport industry- bring back bikes and trains!

  2. ……. LuV Th!Z ChAnnEl bUt P!SSd oFF RyT nOw… Ur #z R aLL FuKd Up AccOrD!Ng 2 H!StOrY BrUh….. ThAt GrEaT PyRaM!Dz wEr MadE !N 2550 B.c.E. ….DaFuQ u MeAn tHeY bU!Lt tHaT W!ThOuT MaTh ? LoL XpLaYn GoBeKL!e TePe …… ReChEk yA WrK kLaSS LoL

  3. God engineered evolution from the first bacteria cells to humans now. He gave us the gift to discover and invent, and we ourselves have become creators now. I hope to see the eradication of polio, a return to a healthy planet, civilization on the Moon, and the discovery of what lies beyond ourselves, such as proof of extraterrestrial life, or even the proof of a deity.

  4. This is a very broad definition for an innovation. Evolution of language is not even an innovation. We now know several other species that have their own language, as well as dialects within species. There are records among Sperm whales to monkeys and primates to birds about transfer of knowledge from one generation to the next and among different communities of these animals too.

    Thinking that language and emotions are restricted to only humans is the hubris of mankind as we don't even know how many and if any of the prehistoric animals also showed these features.

  5. Please look up to "The Venus Project" it offers solution to most of the problems we face today.War, poverty, hunger, starvation, illnesses, crime, deprivation, human suffering can be solved with THE VENUS PROJECT. It offers method to achieve better world. The Venus Project is not perfect/Utopian, its just much better than what we got today

  6. WOW!! Sorry just found your channel but you got sponsored by Bill Gates?! You guys made it and it's great that he focuses on all you do for people and not on .. well you know what I mean!

  7. DNA was discovered before the 1950's. Its role in heredity was known, and features of its structure were discovered, in the first half of the 20th Century. Watson and Crick worked out its complete and precise structure in 1953. And before the Rosalind Franklin myth surfaces: she didn't. She had ascertained, as Crick had done earlier, that it was a double helix. She based her conclusion on a photo taken by her PhD student, who also showed his photo to Watson and Crick. But the double helix was only one, albeit important, feature of the structure.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here