Brian Cox: Something Terrifying Existed Before The Big Bang


What existed before the Big Bang ? This question has always been a challenge for scientists but now it seems they have found the answer to it.
But it has left scientists shocked as Brian Cox revealed that something terrifying existed before the Big Bang. So what existed before the Big Bang? Why has it left scientists terrified?
For copyright matters please contact us at: thespacewindtv@gmail.com

source

Related articles

BIOTECHNOLOGY in the Future: 2050 (Artificial Biology)

What happens when humans begin combining biology with technology,...

Weird and Forgotten technologies part 1 #shorts #history

Weird Technologies of the Past! Witness the incredible...

Top 10 Greatest Inventors of All Time

OUTLINE: 00:00:00 A World Without Inventions 00:01:03 The Inventors and Their Inventions 00:03:09 The Impact...

20 COMMENTS

  1. Scientists' problem is that the more they try to explain the Big Bang, the closer they are to admitting that the Book of Genesis was correct, and that simply terrifies them.

  2. Nothing comes out of nothing
    Scientist are being ignorant that it's too celestial and unexplainable how the big bang happened just as how God is celestial and unexplainable
    You don't expect the wind from your fan to be the reason your papers are all scattered, it's who turned on the fan, it's someone who's that someone? it's God

  3. The only thing able to create time and space is something OUTSIDE time and space, therefore something infinite. This description fits perfectly to a creator and we clearly see intelligent design by all the wonders of nature we are just beginning to understand a fraction about. How the universe is precisely fine tuned and couldn’t exist any other way. “The heaves declare the glory of God, the skies proclaim the work of his hands” psalm 19:1

  4. Science is explaining things we have no clue about. In this, big bang itself defeats every possible theory we have of how objects, planets and material works in outer space. Our earliest understanding of gravity, time, heat/cold effect on object's density and expansion/shrinking…
    I believe Big Bang itself may have something to do with space getting colder. If we are to believe in our theories of how material and objects behave with heat/cold, the cold enviroment of space would slowly substract and shrink the space itself, and it wouldn't essentially warm up itself since there is no planets or suns with athmosphere that bring heat to it. The shrinking of space from freezing temperatures would likely take cold planets towards the epicenters it is shrinking towards. I believe Black holes itself have something to do with these places that could end up pulling everything within it, giving the flow to the 'big bang' theory. In this essence, it would mean that 'big bang' itself can happen everywhere… and it's likely it happens differently than we had expected. Since there are planets that are expected to be even older than theorized 'big bang', meaning the explosion wouldn't have taken everything around it, just a certain radius around it.

    Of course, we can't fully believe the ages of planets, since the concept of time itself in outer space is vastly different and seems to be heavily relied on how planet's current circle mechanism (and our time is indicated by day/night that comes from full circle of Earth. Other planets near us have less or longer amount of hours on their day.)
    The greater mystery really is, how our aging process is so different in outer space compared on Earth. Is existing in outer space within confinements of spaceship, giving possibilities of radiation giving our dna some new rules? It would seem like perception in spaceship would be the same, however they would seem lot more slower, if we are to meet them eye to eye on Earth, since time in space may move lot slower than down on Earth.

  5. I always thought that.
    I mean our big bang is only one big bang because there is a limit to how much universe we can see.
    Bubble in an ocean you wouldn't know were there was another bubble and where it popped.
    Of course there must be many universes but not like Hollywood presents as Multi verse. That's BS

  6. I'm all for science, but when you hear a man of science present a theory that's comprised of very little actual science and an amazing amount of imagination, you can't help but to be skeptical. While I may not be formally educated even I can see that for the Big Bang and Evolution theories to be accurate, one must assume and accept that the wonders of the heavens as well as the incredible biodiversity we see on Earth is basically a matter of chance. In fact, an incredible number of very fortuitous chances must have occurred for us to find ourselves in this wonder of miracles. Consider the odds of even one such evolutionary leap, then the number of such leaps needed to account for nature and all that we see today is astounding. Talk about beating the odds!
    To God The Glory

  7. Essentially Cox is an establishment stooge, his stance on the climate change hoax is laughable, using fake nonsense climate change models as a defence. Cox is the high priest of woke physudo science and a charlatan.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here